|
A lot of the stuff that most of the community work on tend to be rather speculative and as such, should not be presented as facts but rather as mathematically consistent possibilities that exist under certain assumptions, implicit or otherwise. There is also the inevitable theoretical prejudices, or more euphemistically, philosophical leanings, that, in various degrees, underlie all our work. Take for instance, the faith that some of us, myself included, have in lex parsimoniae: Natura nihil agit frustra et nihil facit supervacaneum (law of parsimony: Nature does nothing in vain and creates nothing superfluous). Granted that historically, we have usually found that Nature does, in some sense, adopt a minimalist approach but that certainly does not guarantee that it will always be so or more immediately, that it is so for physics beyond the Standard Model. Even if it does, it might not be in the manner we have traditionally understood what is meant to be simple and elegant. One can probably go on and write a lengthy discourse on all sorts of caveats but in the interest of brevity, I shall not detain you much further. More than anything, it is imperative to keep an open mind. That is not to say that every theory out there is possibly a legitimate candidate. Nature, being the ultimate arbiter, has already ruled out many theories and will continue to do so through the endeavours of high-energy experimentalists.
|